Loading...
ABC News · February 2026
February 2026 editorial profile for ABC News. Below: how this outlet framed the actors and regions it covered most in February 2026. Tap any tile to jump to the detailed card.
Australia25 titles0Reportorial“neutral, event-driven reporting”
Patterns
- factual coverage of weather events and emergencies
- crime and accident reporting without evaluative language toward the country
- mixed political coverage including both domestic and international figures
Caveats
Headlines focus on local events (weather, crime, politics) without framing Australia as a whole positively or negatively; the entity 'AU' is treated as a neutral backdrop for news rather than an actor with a stance.
Representative headlines
TRUMP25 titles-1Skeptical“skeptical and critical”
Patterns
- distancing verbs like 'says' and 'declares' without endorsement
- critical framing of Trump's actions and statements
- highlighting controversies and negative reactions
- use of evaluative language in headlines
Caveats
Some headlines are neutral factual reports, but the overall selection emphasizes Trump's controversial statements and actions, with critical framing in several headlines.
United States25 titles-1Skeptical“critical and skeptical”
Patterns
- negative framing of Trump's actions and character
- use of distancing and evaluative language
- focus on controversies and scandals
- neutral reporting on other US-related topics
Caveats
The entity is 'US' but coverage overwhelmingly focuses on Donald Trump, with critical framing of his policies and personal conduct. Non-Trump US-related headlines (e.g., 18, 24) are neutral. The stance reflects the outlet's skeptical treatment of the US government under Trump, not the country as a whole.
Representative headlines
- →Trump leaves 'door wide open' to nuclear arms race
- →Trump told police chief 'everyone' knew about Epstein, FBI document says
- →Trump described as 'sick individual' over video showing Obamas as apes
- →Trump repeals landmark climate finding
- →What the newly released Epstein files say about Donald Trump
- →Trump's showmanship distracts from all that was riding on today's address
EPSTEIN19 titles-2Adversarial“consistently hostile and delegitimising”
Patterns
- frames Epstein as a criminal enabler and source of scandal
- associates Epstein with powerful figures to imply systemic corruption
- uses victim-centric language to underscore Epstein's harm
- highlights legal and political fallout from Epstein's actions
Caveats
All headlines treat Epstein as a negative figure; no positive or neutral framing exists. The entity is dead and the coverage focuses on his crimes and their aftermath, so stance is uniformly hostile.
United Kingdom17 titles-1Skeptical“critical of royal figure”
Patterns
- focus on Prince Andrew's Epstein scandal
- negative framing of Andrew's actions and character
- use of distancing or critical language ('arrogant', 'car crash')
- selection of headlines highlighting scandal and fallout
Caveats
The entity is GB (country), but coverage overwhelmingly focuses on Prince Andrew's Epstein scandal, not on the UK government or nation as a whole. The stance is negative toward Prince Andrew, but this may not reflect stance toward the country GB. Most headlines are neutral or factual about other UK-related topics (e.g., Starmer, Scottish Labour). The negative tone is specific to Andrew, not the UK broadly.