Asahi Shimbun · Januar 2026

• quotes Trump's own statements with distancing or ironic framing
• highlights negative consequences of Trump's actions
• uses evaluative language like '圧力' (pressure), '混乱' (chaos), '破壊' (destruction)
• includes editorial and op-ed pieces explicitly critical of Trump

Headlines 1, 6, 7 quote Trump neutrally or report his actions without overt editorializing, but the overall bundle is dominated by critical framing, including a direct editorial (9) and op-eds (16, 19, 24) that portray Trump as destabilizing and authoritarian. The outlet's own voice is consistently skeptical, even when reporting Trump's statements.

• entity appears in domestic news as a neutral subject
• no evaluative or emotional framing toward the country
• coverage includes both positive and negative events without bias
• entity used as a geographic or political reference, not as an actor evaluated by the outlet

The entity 'JP' (Japan) is treated as a neutral backdrop or subject in most headlines; no consistent positive or negative stance is detectable. Some headlines involve criticism of Japanese political actors (e.g., '裏金議員'), but these target specific politicians, not the country itself. The outlet's own voice is factual and non-evaluative toward Japan as a whole.

• focuses on Trump's unilateral actions and controversies
• highlights domestic and international opposition to US policies
• uses neutral to slightly critical framing of US government actions
• includes some factual reporting without overt editorializing

The entity is 'US' but coverage overwhelmingly centers on Trump administration actions, often with critical framing (e.g., 'unleashing uncontrollable power', 'protests', 'withdrawal from agreements'). However, some headlines are neutral or report US actions factually. The stance is skeptical of the current US administration's policies and rhetoric, not necessarily of the US as a whole.

• frames Maduro as destructive force behind national crisis
• uses distancing verbs like 'claims' for Maduro's statements
• highlights opposition figures and human cost of his rule
• reports US actions against Maduro without endorsing them

Headline 3 quotes Maduro's 'I was kidnapped' claim with neutral framing, but overall coverage emphasizes his responsibility for emigration and repression, and treats opposition figures sympathetically. The outlet does not adopt US administration's language but does not defend Maduro either.

• blames Maduro for national crisis and mass exodus
• uses distancing quotes from Maduro ('claimed', 'alleges')
• frames Maduro as a problem that Trump acted against
• includes voices critical of US action, not of Maduro

Headline 1 and 15 directly blame Maduro for destroying the country and causing 8 million to flee, showing clear negative editorial stance. Headline 13 quotes Maduro's 'I was kidnapped' claim with distancing, not endorsement. However, several headlines focus on US actions (arrest, attack) without evaluating Maduro himself, and some (e.g., 3, 4, 9) criticize the US rather than Maduro, making the stance toward Maduro consistently critical but not uniformly hostile.