Clarín · April 2026

• negative framing of Milei's governance and political situation
• focus on internal conflicts and erosion of support
• use of evaluative language like 'riesgos', 'pulverizado', 'erosión', 'furias'
• highlighting polls showing decline or tight races

Headlines 7 and 20 show neutral or slightly positive mentions, but the overall bundle is dominated by critical framing of Milei's political standing and decision-making.

• negative framing of internal conflicts and governance failures
• highlighting declining polls and image erosion
• quoting Milei's attacks on others with distancing or critical context
• focus on scandals, denuncias, and dysfunction

The outlet reports Milei's own statements and actions, but consistently frames them within a narrative of crisis, internal strife, and declining support, indicating a skeptical stance toward the entity.

• highlights threats and ultimatums as aggressive
• uses distancing verbs like 'aseguró', 'dice', 'advierte'
• includes critical voices accusing Trump of extremism
• frames Trump's actions as erratic or dangerous

Coverage is largely factual reporting of Trump's statements and actions, but selection emphasizes threats, ultimatums, and criticism from others, creating a skeptical tone. The outlet does not use overtly hostile language itself, but the framing distances from Trump's credibility.

• portrays Trump as aggressive and erratic
• uses distancing verbs like 'dice', 'amenaza', 'advierte'
• highlights opposition and legal challenges to Trump
• frames Trump's actions as ultimatums and threats

Headlines often quote Trump directly, but the outlet's framing (e.g., 'acusado de loco', 'ultimátums', 'amenazas apocalípticas') conveys skepticism and criticism. Some headlines are neutral factual reports, but the overall selection emphasizes negative aspects of Trump's actions and reactions.