Folha de S.Paulo · März 2026

• highlights Trump's miscalculations and contradictions
• uses distancing verbs like 'diz' (says) and 'insiste' (insists) to imply bluster
• frames Trump's actions as erratic or failing (recua, contradiz, erro de cálculo)
• includes critical quotes from opponents (Lula, chanceler) without rebuttal

Headline 10 is positive toward Trump ('fazendo um favor ao mundo livre'), but it is an outlier; the majority of headlines frame Trump as unreliable, overreaching, or facing opposition. The outlet's own voice is skeptical, not hostile, so -1 rather than -2.

• uses negative labels like 'sociopata'
• frames Trump's actions as threats or chaos
• highlights contradictions and failures
• quotes critics and opposition figures

Stance is toward the US entity, not just Trump; coverage is critical of US actions and leadership, but some headlines are neutral or factual. The negative tone is driven by Trump's portrayal, which colors the US stance.

• neutral reporting of events involving Bolsonaro
• critical framing through judicial actions (Moraes decisions)
• quotes from allies and opponents without outlet endorsement
• health updates treated factually

Coverage is a mix of factual health updates, judicial proceedings, and political maneuvering. Headlines 7 and 24 report court decisions against Bolsonaro neutrally, while 8 uses a mildly critical metaphor ('ex-atleta imorrível a idoso frágil'). No consistent positive or negative stance toward Bolsonaro himself; the outlet reports actions by and about him without clear editorial slant.

• factual reporting of government actions
• occasional critical framing via third-party criticism
• use of Lula's name in policy announcements without evaluative language
• inclusion of negative polls and opposition attacks

Coverage is predominantly neutral and policy-focused, but includes negative polling data (headline 3) and opposition criticism (headline 2) without editorial endorsement. Headline 16 offers a mildly positive assessment of Lula's policy decision. The bundle lacks consistent hostility or celebration, resulting in a neutral stance.

• highlights negative approval ratings for Lula's government
• reports controversies involving Lula's family and allies
• uses distancing or critical framing in some headlines
• includes neutral factual reporting on government actions

The bundle covers a mix of government actions, scandals, and neutral news; the negative stance is driven by repeated focus on falling approval ratings and controversies involving Lula's inner circle, but the outlet does not use consistently hostile or delegitimising language.

• reports attacks on and by Iran without evaluative adjectives
• highlights internal dissent and regime vulnerability
• frames Iran as a source of regional instability and economic disruption
• uses neutral or factual language about military actions

Headlines are largely factual reporting of events; negative stance inferred from selection that foregrounds Iran's military actions, internal repression, and regime targeting, but outlet does not use overtly hostile language. Headline 2 explicitly frames artists as fighting the regime, indicating sympathy with anti-regime actors rather than the state.