Fox News · Februar 2026

• Foregrounds Trump's policy wins and initiatives
• Quotes Trump authoritatively without distancing verbs
• Frames critics as partisan or out-of-touch
• Uses positive or neutral framing for Trump's actions

Headlines 4, 14, 18, 21, 22, 23 include criticism or opposition, but these are attributed to others (House Republicans, Greenland, France, Democrats, Whoopi) and do not reflect Fox News' own stance toward Trump; the outlet's editorial voice consistently treats Trump as credible and authoritative.

• associates Epstein with criminal and scandalous activities
• uses negative framing like 'evil exploits', 'compromising', 'vulgar'
• focuses on Epstein's network and fallout as a scandal
• portrays Epstein as a central figure in a web of corruption

The outlet's stance is toward Epstein as a deceased criminal figure; coverage is uniformly negative, treating him as a source of scandal and evil, with no sympathetic or neutral framing.

• foregrounds Trump administration achievements and actions
• uses positive framing for US officials and policies
• frames US as strong and proactive
• occasional neutral reporting on US-related events

The outlet's stance is toward the US as a country, but coverage heavily focuses on the Trump administration, which is treated positively. Some headlines are neutral or mixed, and a few mention US entities in a neutral or critical context (e.g., Greenland rejecting proposal). The positive stance is driven by selection and framing of US government actions.

• frames Iran as aggressor or threat
• highlights regime vulnerability and power struggles
• uses distancing language for Iranian officials
• amplifies US/Israeli perspectives and warnings

The outlet consistently treats Iran as a hostile actor and its leadership as illegitimate or dangerous, but stops short of outright delegitimizing language like 'regime' in every headline; the stance is skeptical/critical rather than purely hostile.