Al Arabiya · Mai 2026

• reports Trump's actions and statements without evaluative adjectives
• uses direct quotes and neutral attribution ('says', 'arrives')
• includes headlines that frame Trump as a source of pressure or threat ('warns', 'threatens', 'ultimatum')
• occasional critical framing via third-party criticism (e.g., 'Rubio visits Vatican to contain tensions after Trump's criticism of Pope')

Headlines are predominantly factual and neutral, but some (e.g., #1, #4, #20) implicitly present Trump as a source of tension or confrontation, which slightly tilts toward skeptical framing. However, the outlet does not use overtly hostile language or delegitimizing terms, and many headlines simply report his statements and actions without editorializing. The mix of Arabic and English headlines shows consistent neutral tone.

• Quotes US officials without distancing verbs
• Foregrounds US policy moves and statements as newsworthy
• Uses neutral or respectful framing for US actions
• Occasional critical coverage of US business or military posture

Headlines 13 and 18 include critical framing of US policy (China buildup, geopolitical tensions), but overall the outlet amplifies US official statements as credible and central, indicating a generally favourable stance toward the US as an actor.

• Quotes Netanyahu's statements directly without evaluative adjectives
• Reports military actions and political moves factually
• Occasionally uses headlines that imply pressure or difficulty for Netanyahu (e.g., health, coalition splits, Trump tensions)
• Mixes Arabic and English coverage with similar neutral-to-slightly-critical tone

The outlet largely reports Netanyahu's actions and statements without overt hostility or celebration. However, some headlines (e.g., #13 on pardon negotiations, #20 on tense call with Trump, #24 on difficulty influencing Trump) subtly imply vulnerability or weakness, which leans slightly skeptical. Overall, the stance is neutral because the coverage is predominantly factual and does not consistently delegitimize or lionize Netanyahu.

• Xi appears in summit contexts alongside Trump and Putin as a peer
• Headlines mix neutral reporting of events with occasional positive framing ('opens doors')
• Some headlines use Xi's name without distancing verbs, others quote third-party analysts critically
• No consistent evaluative language toward CN as an entity

The outlet treats CN as a normal diplomatic actor; coverage is largely factual or event-driven. Headline 9 ('Xi opens doors') is mildly positive, but headline 22 and 24 include critical third-party assessments of summit outcomes. No systematic hostility or celebration toward CN itself.

• Quotes Netanyahu's statements without evaluative adjectives
• Reports Israeli military actions as factual events
• Includes headlines critical of Israel (e.g., 'Israel 'tricks' and 'Hezbollah' wins')
• Mixes Arabic and English coverage with similar neutral tone

The outlet reports both Israeli actions and criticisms (e.g., headline 23 suggests negative framing of Israel), but overall the coverage is factual and balanced, with no consistent positive or negative stance toward the entity (IL). The entity is often quoted directly, but the outlet does not amplify or delegitimize it systematically.

• reports Hezbollah as military adversary of Israel
• highlights US and Israeli actions against Hezbollah
• covers Lebanese government as separate from Hezbollah
• uses negative framing for Hezbollah (terrorist, losses, interference)

The outlet's stance toward Lebanon as a country is neutral; most negative framing targets Hezbollah, not the state. Headlines about Lebanon's government (e.g., PM Nawaf Salam) are factual or neutral. The entity is LB (country), not Hezbollah, so the anti-Hezbollah tone does not reflect a negative stance toward Lebanon itself.

• highlights threats and negative actions by Iran or its proxies
• uses distancing or negative framing for Iranian officials and entities
• reports on internal power struggles and repression
• includes condemnations and warnings from other actors against Iran

Some headlines neutrally report Iranian statements or actions, but the overall selection emphasizes threats, internal conflict, and external condemnation, indicating a skeptical stance toward Iran.

• Putin quoted directly as credible actor
• Focus on Putin's diplomatic and strategic initiatives
• Neutral-to-positive selection of topics (deals, peace, technology)

Headlines are predominantly factual or quote Putin without distancing language, but a few (e.g., 18) include external criticism of Russia. Overall, the outlet treats Putin as a legitimate global leader.

• Rubio quoted directly as authoritative source on Iran negotiations
• Headlines foreground Rubio's statements as newsworthy and substantive
• Neutral-to-positive framing of his diplomatic role and statements
• Occasional trivial coverage (clothing controversy) but not delegitimizing

Headlines 1 and 18 include trivial/personal coverage (denial of mimicking Maduro, clothing controversy) which slightly complicates the otherwise positive framing. However, these are not hostile; they treat Rubio as a figure of interest. The entity's quoted content is often about Iran negotiations, but the outlet itself treats Rubio as a credible, authoritative source.

• foregrounding Saudi corporate earnings and growth
• highlighting Saudi mega-projects and international partnerships
• quoting Saudi officials and executives as authoritative sources
• neutral-to-positive framing of Saudi state entities and initiatives

Headline 16 quotes a Gulf official criticizing Iran, not SA directly; headline 18 is Al Arabiya defending itself against Iranian media, not about SA. Overall, the outlet treats SA as a normal, successful economic actor with no critical framing.

• foregrounds Israeli military actions against Hamas leaders
• uses neutral or factual language for Hamas statements
• frames Hamas as an obstacle or problem (e.g., 'تخلي حماس عن سلاحها غير قابل للتفاوض')
• occasionally amplifies Hamas denials or responses without endorsement

The outlet reports Hamas statements and reactions neutrally (e.g., headlines 13, 19), but the overall selection emphasizes Israeli strikes and frames Hamas as a security threat or political obstacle, suggesting a skeptical stance. No celebratory or sympathetic language toward Hamas is present.

• foregrounding political crises and resignations
• using dramatic framing ('أكبر أزمة', 'في مهب الريح', 'أخطر اختبار')
• quoting Starmer defensively while highlighting opposition
• mixing neutral business reporting with negative political coverage

The outlet's stance is toward the UK government under Starmer, not the country GB broadly. Business and trade headlines (e.g., 5, 15, 17) are neutral or factual, but the political coverage consistently frames the government as embattled and failing, yielding a skeptical/critical stance overall.

• Quotes Putin as a credible decision-maker without distancing verbs
• Foregrounds Putin's strategic wins (gas deal, missile, debt relief)
• Presents Putin's statements as factual announcements
• Frames Putin as a global leader shaping multipolar order

Headline 11 is a third-party report (FT) that could imply criticism, but it is attributed and not the outlet's own voice; overall the outlet treats Putin as a major authoritative figure whose actions and statements are reported without skepticism.

• Quotes Xi's actions and statements without distancing verbs
• Frames Xi as a key diplomatic actor in summits with Trump and Putin
• Uses neutral-to-positive descriptors like 'إيجابي' (positive) for Xi's meetings
• Reports Xi's warnings and positions as authoritative

Headlines are largely factual or quote third-party analysts; no overt celebration or hostility. Xi is treated as a legitimate leader in diplomatic reporting, but the outlet does not adopt a promotional tone. The entity's quoted content (e.g., warning Putin) is critical of others, but the outlet itself is neutral-to-favourable toward Xi.