Corriere della Sera · Februar 2026

• frames Trump as aggressive or threatening
• highlights opposition and internal dissent
• uses distancing verbs and critical framing
• questions Trump's mental fitness and motives

Some headlines report Trump's statements neutrally (e.g., 5, 8, 19), but the overall selection emphasizes conflict, criticism, and negative framing. Headline 11 is ambiguous ('Trump in Paradiso' could be ironic or literal). The outlet's own vocabulary ('teme', 'minaccia', 'dubbi sulla sua salute mentale') shows a skeptical stance toward Trump.

• Quotes Meloni's statements directly without evaluative verbs
• Reports opposition attacks on Meloni without endorsing them
• Uses Meloni's own words to frame policy announcements
• Includes critical external voices (judges, EU, Monti) but balances with Meloni's responses

Coverage is largely factual and balanced; Meloni is quoted authoritatively on policy (positive signal), but the outlet also reports criticism from opponents and EU without taking sides. Headline 4 uses 'ira di Meloni' which could imply emotional reaction, but overall stance is neutral.

• associates Trump with Epstein scandal and negative implications
• uses distancing verbs like 'teme' (fears) and 'prova' (tries) to frame Trump's actions as defensive or manipulative
• highlights internal Republican divisions and potential voter intimidation
• quotes Trump's statements but often juxtaposes them with counterclaims or critical context

The outlet's stance is toward the US as represented by the Trump administration; coverage is consistently skeptical and critical, focusing on scandals, political maneuvering, and negative implications, but stops short of outright hostility. The entity is the US government under Trump, not the country as a whole.

• factual reporting of events and statements
• occasional critical framing of government actions
• positive coverage of national achievements (sports, industry)

Coverage of Italy is mixed: positive on sports and economic news, but critical on justice/political issues (e.g., SeaWatch ruling). No consistent positive or negative stance toward the country as a whole.

• associates Epstein with criminal network and abuse
• highlights victims' testimony and trauma
• frames Epstein as central to a scandal implicating powerful figures
• uses distancing language like 'implicati' (implicated) and 'accuse' (accusations)

The outlet consistently reports on Epstein as a perpetrator of sexual abuse and a central figure in a scandal, using victim testimony and investigative framing. While some headlines are neutral in tone, the overall selection emphasises criminality and negative associations, indicating a critical stance toward Epstein.

• reports German political actions factually
• uses neutral or positive framing for Merz's initiatives
• includes critical or skeptical headlines about Germany's role
• mixes domestic German news with EU-level coverage

Coverage is varied: some headlines treat German leaders (Merz) as authoritative actors, while others raise concerns about German power ('torna la questione tedesca?'). The outlet does not consistently praise or attack DE; stance is neutral overall.

• portrays Putin as irrational and trapped in war
• highlights Russian losses and economic strain
• uses evaluative language like 'sacrificate', 'illusione', 'fallito'
• quotes critics and Western officials to undermine Russian narrative

Headline 12 includes Macron's statement about dialogue, but overall framing remains negative toward Russia and Putin; the entity is the country RU, not just Putin, but coverage treats Russia as an aggressor facing inevitable decline.

• reports Macron's statements and actions factually
• uses critical framing in some headlines (e.g., 'schiaffo', 'brutte tentazioni')
• includes headlines where Macron is quoted authoritatively
• some headlines focus on conflict or tension involving Macron

The bundle is mixed: some headlines treat Macron neutrally or as a source (e.g., 6, 11), while others use critical language ('schiaffo', 'brutte tentazioni') that implies negative framing. However, the overall stance toward FR (country) is not consistently hostile or favourable; many headlines are about other entities or financial news. Confidence is low due to small sample and mixed signals.