Gazeta.ru · Mai 2026

• foregrounding US officials' problems and failures
• quoting US officials with distancing or critical framing
• highlighting US diplomatic setbacks and internal contradictions

Many headlines are neutral reports of US actions or statements, but the selection emphasizes negative aspects (e.g., Trump not meeting wounded soldiers, Trump 'dressing' Obama in prison robes, Trump planning to stay beyond term). The outlet does not consistently celebrate or lionize the US; it often implies criticism or exposes vulnerabilities.

• entity quoted as authoritative source
• positive framing of entity's actions and statements
• entity shown in informal, humanizing contexts
• entity's international engagements presented as normal and important

The entity (RU) is consistently treated as a credible, central actor; headlines use direct quotes and neutral-to-positive verbs ('раскрыл', 'поздравил', 'побеседовали'). No distancing or critical language is used toward the entity. The positive stance is moderate because coverage is factual and not overtly celebratory.

• Putin quoted directly as a decisive actor
• Putin's statements framed as policy positions
• Putin shown in positive interactions with foreign leaders
• Putin's humor and personal qualities highlighted

Headlines consistently present Putin as a central, authoritative figure whose words and actions are reported without distancing or criticism. Even when he discusses sensitive topics (e.g., missile strikes, conflict with Iran), the outlet uses neutral or positive framing. The entity's quoted content may be confrontational toward others, but the outlet's stance toward Putin is clearly favourable.

• quoting Zelensky with distancing verbs (заявил, угрожает, обвинил)
• amplifying Russian official criticism of Zelensky
• foregrounding threats and failures attributed to Zelensky
• using third-party negative labels (фашизм, зеленый гоблин)

The outlet consistently frames Zelensky as a source of threats, accusations, and failures, while giving platform to Russian officials and critics who delegitimize him. The entity's own quoted content is often hostile to Russia, but the outlet's editorial treatment is skeptical and critical toward Zelensky himself.

• Trump is quoted directly as a decision-maker and source of information
• Headlines use neutral or positive framing verbs like 'рассказал', 'пообещал', 'объявил', 'раскрыл'
• No distancing or critical vocabulary from the outlet
• Occasional mildly critical or neutral factual reporting (e.g., not meeting wounded soldiers)

Headline 2 is a neutral factual report of a missed meeting, not hostile. Headline 16 is mildly humorous but not delegitimising. Overall, the outlet treats Trump as a credible actor whose statements are newsworthy, without overt criticism or promotion.

• quoting Russian officials who attack Zelensky
• using verbs like 'пригрозил' (threatened) and 'заигрался' (overplayed his hand)
• foregrounding Zelensky's weakness and fear
• framing his warnings as baseless or manipulative

The outlet consistently amplifies Russian government and pro-Russian sources (Zakharova, ex-deputies) who criticize Zelensky, and uses dismissive language ('парень заигрался'). Zelensky's own statements are reported but often undercut by context or juxtaposed with hostile commentary. The stance is clearly skeptical and critical, though not outright hostile (-2) because some headlines are neutral factual reports.

• verbs of authoritative speech: назвала, отреагировала, заявила, прокомментировала, призвала
• humour and irony presented as clever: пошутила, сыронизировала, ответила строчкой из песни
• framing as moral arbiter: пристыдила, подвергла жесткой критике, призвала
• no distancing or evaluative language from outlet; her words are amplified as official truth

Zakharova's quoted content is often critical of Western actors and Ukraine, but the outlet treats her as a credible, authoritative voice — never using distancing verbs or framing her negatively. Stance is positive toward her as a source.

• Lukashenko quoted directly as a credible decision-maker
• Headlines frame his statements as authoritative announcements
• Positive or neutral framing of Belarusian actions and Lukashenko's role
• No critical or distancing language toward Lukashenko or Belarus

The entity is BY (country), but coverage overwhelmingly focuses on Lukashenko as its leader. The outlet treats him as a legitimate spokesperson and decision-maker, quoting him without skepticism. Headlines like 'Лукашенко заявил' (stated) are neutral, but the selection amplifies his perspective. No headlines criticize Belarus or Lukashenko; even threats from Ukraine are reported as Lukashenko's response. The only potential negative is headline 15 about Tikhanovskaya, but it is isolated and does not frame Lukashenko negatively.

• direct quoting without distancing verbs
• positive framing of Lukashenko's statements and actions
• amplification of his geopolitical role and authority
• absence of critical or delegitimizing language

The outlet consistently presents Lukashenko as a credible leader whose statements are reported without skepticism; even when he criticizes others (e.g., Macron, Ukraine), the outlet's own voice remains neutral or favorable toward him. No headlines show hostility or distancing.

• Russian officials and media respond dismissively or mockingly to Kallas's statements
• Kallas is quoted but her words are immediately countered or ridiculed by Russian sources
• Headlines frame Kallas as a target of criticism from Russian authorities and lawmakers
• Use of derogatory or belittling language toward Kallas (e.g., 'лечить психику', 'жестко высказался')

The outlet Gazeta.ru is a Russian media source; the coverage consistently presents Kallas as an antagonist whose statements are met with rebuttals or mockery from Russian officials, indicating a skeptical stance toward her. However, the outlet does not use outright hostile language itself but amplifies Russian official responses, resulting in a -1 rather than -2.

• Russian officials and state-aligned figures mock, insult, or dismiss Kallas
• Kallas is framed as irrational, vengeful, or mentally unstable
• Headlines use imperative verbs ('посоветовали', 'дали совет') to talk down to Kallas
• Kallas's statements are met with ridicule or rebuttal from Russian authorities

The outlet is Russian state-aligned; Kallas is an EU official critical of Russia, so the hostility is expected. The entity's own quoted content (e.g., calling for sanctions, accusing US/China/Russia) is critical of others, but the outlet's framing of Kallas herself is uniformly negative.