Le Figaro · April 2026

• Quoting critics who frame Trump's actions as failures or bluffs
• Using evaluative language like 'toxique', 'radioactif', 'fiasco'
• Highlighting domestic and international opposition to Trump
• Distancing through expert or opponent quotes rather than direct endorsement

Some headlines report Trump's statements neutrally (e.g., 1, 10, 17, 20), but the overall selection heavily foregrounds criticism, failure, and rejection of Trump, with multiple headlines quoting detractors or using negative framing. The outlet's own voice is skeptical, not hostile throughout, hence -1 rather than -2.

• negative framing of Trump's actions and decisions
• distancing verbs and critical commentary
• highlighting failures and controversies
• quoting critics and opponents

The outlet consistently treats Trump as a problematic figure, using critical language and framing his actions negatively. However, the entity is 'US' and the coverage focuses almost entirely on Trump, who is the de facto representative. The stance toward the US as a country is inferred from the treatment of its leader; there is no positive or neutral coverage of US institutions or policies.

• reports on political figures and events without evaluative framing toward the country itself
• covers social issues (immigration, racism, prison overcrowding) as factual problems
• includes both positive and negative stories about French institutions and policies
• uses direct quotes from officials without explicit endorsement or criticism of France

The entity is a country, not a single actor; coverage spans many domestic topics with varying tones. Headlines about immigration (9) and racism (22) could imply criticism of French society, but the outlet does not consistently frame France negatively. Headline 16 criticizes Macron's punctuality, but that targets a person, not the country. Overall stance toward France as a nation is neutral.