NDTV · Juni 2026

• Frequent quoting of foreign leaders praising Modi (Trump, Putin, Macron, US diplomats)
• Positive framing of Modi's actions and achievements (longest-serving PM, high-level meets, investment wins)
• Use of honorific 'PM Modi' consistently, with no critical or distancing language
• Selection bias toward favorable events (birthday wishes, world leader compliments, investment announcements)

Headlines are largely factual but overwhelmingly positive in selection and framing. Some items (e.g., #15 about Nirav Modi) are unrelated to the person 'MODI' and do not affect stance. The outlet does not use hostile or skeptical language toward Modi; it amplifies praise from other leaders, indicating a favorable stance. However, no overtly promotional or celebratory editorializing is present, so +2 is not warranted.

• Direct quotes from Trump presented without evaluative framing
• Frequent use of 'says', 'signals', 'predicts' — neutral attribution
• Occasional critical context (e.g., 'objectives unfulfilled', 'law struck down')
• Mix of policy reporting and personal drama (photo war, walkout)

Coverage is largely factual and quote-driven, but includes some critical framing (e.g., unfulfilled objectives, legal setback, eroded trust). Trump's own aggressive rhetoric is reported without endorsement, but also without explicit condemnation. Stance is neutral overall, with slight negative undertones from contextual reporting.

• Frequent positive framing of PM Modi's international engagements and investments
• Neutral-to-sympathetic coverage of BJP political developments
• Occasional critical or neutral reporting on opposition figures and controversies
• Use of official sources and authoritative quotes for government actions

The bundle includes several neutral or critical items (e.g., TCS scandal, arrests, opposition attacks), but the overall selection and framing of India-related stories—especially those involving PM Modi and government initiatives—tends to be favourable, treating India as a rising global player. The entity is the country, so stance reflects the outlet's treatment of India as a whole, not a single actor.

• Frequent use of Trump's own aggressive quotes without pushback, but framed as flexing or warning
• Headlines highlight controversial or failed actions (tariffs, H-1B fee struck down, autopilot crash)
• Occasional critical framing via third-party critics (Bolton, Khamenei, Lula, Jaishankar)
• Neutral reporting on US institutions (Pentagon, Supreme Court) with evaluative verbs like 'supercharges'

The entity is 'US' broadly, but most headlines focus on Trump's actions and statements. The outlet often quotes Trump directly without overt editorializing, but selection emphasizes his threats, legal defeats, and foreign criticism, yielding a mildly skeptical stance toward the administration. Some headlines (e.g., #4, #17) are neutral or even positive toward Trump, creating mixed signals. The stance is toward the US government/Trump, not the country as a whole.

• Frames Netanyahu as isolated, surprised, and losing control
• Uses distancing and critical framing around Netanyahu's statements
• Highlights Trump's dominance and Netanyahu's dependence
• Foregrounds Netanyahu's setbacks and diplomatic defeats

The outlet's stance toward Netanyahu is skeptical/critical, but the entity's own quoted content is often aggressive toward others (e.g., Iran, Hezbollah, Erdogan); the outlet does not endorse that content, instead framing Netanyahu as a weakened figure. Some headlines are neutral reports of his statements, but the overall selection emphasizes his isolation and loss of leverage.