Süddeutsche Zeitung · Januar 2026

• predominantly domestic political reporting without evaluative framing of Germany
• entity appears as setting or subject of policy debates, not as actor evaluated by outlet

Headlines focus on German political actors and events, but the entity 'DE' (Germany) is treated as a neutral backdrop; no consistent positive or negative editorial stance toward the country itself is discernible.

• foregrounding Trump's threats and aggressive rhetoric
• using distancing or mocking framing ('droht', 'äfft nach', 'Hardlinerin')
• highlighting opposition and negative consequences (protests, unpopularity, retaliation)
• selecting headlines that question US credibility or expose contradictions

The outlet's stance is consistently skeptical toward the US administration under Trump, but the entity is 'US' as a country, not just Trump. Headlines about US actions (e.g., Witkoff travel, Pentagon incident) are reported neutrally or with implied criticism. The overall tone is critical of US policy and leadership, not celebratory or neutral.

• Trump as threat or aggressor (droht, Verrat, Übernahme)
• Trump as irrational or dangerous (neuer Hitler, schieße, Willkür)
• Trump as adversary to be resisted (wehrt sich, rüstet sich, nichts gefallen lassen)
• Trump's actions framed as illegitimate or harmful (Hinrichtungen, Verschwindenlassen, Ablehnung)

Headlines 4, 18, 21, 22 offer slight nuance or factual reporting, but the overwhelming majority frame Trump negatively, with strong evaluative language and delegitimising framing.