Daily Sabah · January 2026

• Trump's actions reported as assertive or controversial
• Quotes from Trump presented without evaluative framing
• Headlines often pair Trump with conflict or pushback from other actors
• Occasional use of scare quotes around Trump's initiatives

The outlet reports Trump's statements and actions factually, but often in contexts where he is challenged or rebuffed by other nations (e.g., Greenland, Board of Peace). Headline 7 uses scare quotes around 'peace', implying skepticism. However, the outlet also reports Trump's interactions with Erdoğan neutrally, and no headlines use overtly hostile or celebratory language toward Trump himself. The stance is neutral overall, with a slight skeptical undertone from selection and framing.

• reports US actions and statements factually without overt editorializing
• occasionally uses distancing quotes around US claims ('Board of Peace', 'peace' board)
• includes critical voices from other actors (Europe, Denmark, NYC mayor) without endorsing them
• highlights US assertive moves (tariff threats, Greenland purchase, Venezuela warnings) as news

The outlet reports US actions and statements neutrally overall, but includes headlines critical of US policy from third parties (e.g., 'Hands off Greenland' rally, 'act of war' quote). No consistent positive or negative framing of the US as an entity; coverage is factual with occasional skeptical distance in quotes. The entity is the US as a country, not a specific administration, and the bundle mixes routine diplomatic reporting with some critical voices.

• foregrounds Turkish leadership and diplomatic initiatives
• uses positive framing for Turkish actions and statements
• adopts official Turkish terminology (e.g., 'terror-free Türkiye', 'FETÖ', 'PKK/YPG')
• highlights Turkish successes and resilience

The outlet consistently treats Türkiye and its leaders as authoritative and credible, amplifying their statements without distancing. Headlines that mention Turkish officials or policies are framed positively or neutrally, and the outlet adopts Turkish government terminology for designated terrorist groups. No critical or skeptical framing of Türkiye is present.

• labels YPG/PKK as terrorists consistently
• frames Syrian army actions as legitimate and defensive
• highlights Syrian government's diplomatic and military successes
• uses positive verbs for Syrian officials ('hails', 'announces')

The outlet's stance is clearly favorable to the Syrian government (SY), treating it as a legitimate actor fighting terrorism and restoring sovereignty. The negative framing is directed at YPG/PKK, not at Syria. Headlines about Turkish support also align with this positive stance.

• Erdoğan quoted directly as a credible global leader
• Headlines foreground Erdoğan's diplomatic engagements and statements
• Positive framing of Erdoğan's vision and actions ('bright future', 'hails resilience')
• No distancing verbs or critical editorial language

The outlet consistently amplifies Erdoğan's statements and positions without skepticism, treating him as an authoritative voice on international affairs. Even when Erdoğan criticizes others (e.g., Israel, YPG), the outlet's own framing remains favorable toward him.

• foregrounds Palestinian suffering and displacement
• amplifies Palestinian governance initiatives as legitimate
• uses neutral or factual framing for Palestinian actors
• highlights international criticism of Israeli actions

The outlet does not use overtly hostile language toward PS, but coverage is filtered through Turkish foreign policy lens; PS is treated as a victim and a legitimate political entity, not as an antagonist. The entity's own statements are not directly quoted, so stance is inferred from selection and framing.