O Globo · April 2026

• highlights political weakness and isolation
• uses distancing verbs and problem-framing
• reports on investigations and controversies
• occasional neutral policy coverage

Some headlines report Lula's actions neutrally (e.g., policy announcements), but the overall selection emphasises political vulnerability, internal pressure, and potential self-inflicted traps, indicating a skeptical editorial stance.

• reports Trump's actions with negative consequences (tariffs, science cuts, geopolitical risk)
• uses distancing or critical framing ('ameaça', 'tarifaço', 'bloqueio', 'corta dinheiro')
• includes voices that contradict or criticize Trump (Iran, Lula, ex-model, analysts)
• occasionally reports Trump's own claims neutrally or with implied skepticism

Several headlines report Trump's statements and actions factually without overt editorializing (e.g., #3, #8, #14), but the overall selection emphasizes negative impacts and criticism. The outlet does not consistently delegitimize Trump (no -2), but it does not treat him as authoritative or sympathetic either. The entity's quoted content is often self-promotional or threatening, which the outlet reports without endorsement.

• highlights US military setbacks and contradictions
• reports negative economic consequences of US policies
• covers domestic US controversies and legal actions
• includes critical analysis and opposition voices

Several headlines are neutral factual reports about US actions (e.g., ceasefire, tech deals), but the bundle overall emphasizes failures, risks, and negative impacts of US policies, especially under Trump. The outlet does not use consistently delegitimizing language, but the selection skews critical.

• factual reporting of government actions and political figures
• occasional critical framing of government (e.g., 'à deriva')
• balanced coverage of multiple political actors
• no consistent evaluative language toward the country as a whole

The entity is a country (BR), not a single actor; coverage spans government, opposition, and social issues. Some headlines imply criticism of the Lula government (e.g., 'à deriva'), but others report neutrally or positively on government initiatives. No unified stance toward the country emerges.

• associates Bolsonaro with criminal investigations and legal troubles
• frames Flávio Bolsonaro as a political actor using aggressive tactics
• highlights internal family and party tensions
• uses neutral reporting but selects negative or controversial angles

Most headlines focus on Flávio Bolsonaro, not Jair Bolsonaro directly; the stance toward Jair Bolsonaro is inferred from his association with legal issues (prison, 8/1 benefits) and negative framing of his son's campaign mimicking his style. The outlet does not use overtly hostile language but consistently foregrounds controversies and legal problems.