RT · July 2026

• Foregrounds US setbacks, scandals, and internal dysfunction
• Uses third-party sources (Reuters, Axios, NYT, CNN) to report US problems
• Highlights foreign criticism or mockery of US actions
• Frames US as unreliable or overstretched in conflicts

Some headlines neutrally report US diplomatic moves (e.g., Lavrov-Rubio talks) and even quote Putin congratulating Trump, which slightly offsets negativity. The outlet's stance is critical but not uniformly hostile; it often relies on external reports rather than direct editorializing.

• Frequent use of distancing and delegitimizing framing around Zelensky (e.g., 'humiliated', 'wants civilian casualties', 'power grab')
• Selection of headlines highlighting scandals, dismissals, and foreign criticism of Zelensky
• Amplification of opposition and foreign voices critical of Zelensky without balancing positive coverage
• Use of loaded terms and quotes from adversarial sources (e.g., Zakharova, Peskov, Telizhenko) to frame Zelensky negatively

The outlet's stance is consistently skeptical/critical toward Zelensky, but not uniformly hostile; some headlines are neutral factual reports. The entity's own statements (e.g., 'Crimea not on Kiev's agenda') are reported without overt editorializing, but the overall selection and framing tilt negative. Note that some negative framing comes from quoting third parties (e.g., Zakharova, Polish politician), yet the outlet's choice to amplify these without counterbalance indicates a critical stance.

• Amplifies Russian officials' statements as authoritative
• Frames Russian actions as defensive or successful
• Uses positive or neutral verbs for Russian entities, distancing for adversaries
• Highlights Russian achievements and Western failures

The outlet consistently presents Russian state actors (Putin, Lavrov, Zakharova, etc.) as credible and their actions as justified, while framing Ukraine and the West as aggressors or unreliable. However, some headlines are purely factual (e.g., ISS crew return, Durov register), and the entity is a country rather than a single person, so the stance is moderately positive rather than strongly promotional.

• Uses distancing and critical verbs ('resorts to whataboutism', 'faces scrutiny', 'denies')
• Highlights failures, controversies, and negative consequences of Trump's actions
• Frames Trump as erratic or ineffective in foreign policy (warnings, threats, 'won't end the war')
• Includes critical voices (Tucker Carlson, ex-commander, Senate warning) without counterbalance

Some headlines are neutral factual reports of Trump's actions or statements (e.g., tariffs, plane switch), and a few quote him without overt evaluation. However, the overall selection emphasizes criticism, skepticism, and negative framing of Trump's decisions and credibility, suggesting a mildly negative stance rather than outright hostility.

• Frames Zelensky as power-hungry and erratic (reshuffles, dismissals, 'power grab')
• Amplifies opposition and foreign criticism (Polish 'Hitler' portrait, disapproval polls, Zakharova's 'humiliated' claim)
• Uses distancing and accusatory framing ('wants civilian casualties', 'Zelensky's wallet' Mindich)
• Selects headlines that undermine his authority and credibility

Some headlines are neutral factual reports (e.g., 6, 12, 18), and the outlet quotes Zelensky's own statements (21) without overt editorializing. However, the overall selection and framing—especially amplifying hostile foreign voices and scandal-adjacent claims—tilts toward a skeptical, delegitimizing stance rather than outright hostility.