Loading...
Loading...
How United States argues across the disputes we follow
19 positions
The Israel-US-Saudi coalition: Iran is an illegitimate existential threat
Israel's campaigns are existential self-defense after October 7
China is a strategic competitor; firmness, derisking and export controls justified
North Korea's proliferation and closed door are a hardening threat
Intra-Western disputes expose Western hypocrisy, disunity and decline
Pressure on the governments in Caracas and Havana is justified
The South China Sea must follow the rules-based maritime order
Alliance deterrence plus engagement is the right Korea policy
External mediation and mineral deals are finally stabilising the Great Lakes
Cartels are terrorists and Mexico's state is compromised; US pressure and intervention are justified
Reopened US-Russia channel and energy waivers are pragmatic realism
The South Caucasus is tilting West; engagement and the settlement are gains
The Thailand-Cambodia clash as an occasion for great-power mediation
US strategic expansion (Greenland, hemisphere) is legitimate necessity