NDTV · January 2026

• Quotes Indian officials and leaders authoritatively
• Reports political events and statements without evaluative language
• Occasional use of positive framing for India's global standing
• Mixed coverage of domestic political conflicts

Headline 7 and 21 present India positively (AI power, trust in India), but most headlines are neutral reporting of domestic politics, statements, and events. Headline 17 shows NDTV questioning a Polish minister about Pakistan's terrorism, implying a pro-India stance on cross-border issues, but this is indirect. Overall, the outlet does not consistently praise or criticize India as a country; coverage is factual and event-driven.

• Quotes Trump's statements directly without evaluative adjectives
• Reports Trump's actions and policies factually
• Includes critical reactions from other actors (e.g., Congress leader, late-night hosts)
• Occasional use of 'threats' and 'tensions' in headlines about Trump's moves

The bundle is mixed: many headlines report Trump's statements and actions neutrally (e.g., #1, #6, #11, #13, #19, #20, #23, #25), but several include critical framing from third parties (#15, #21, #24) or use words like 'threats' (#17) and 'tensions' (#5). The outlet itself does not adopt a consistently positive or negative voice toward Trump; it mostly relays his words and actions with minimal editorializing, while also covering opposition reactions. Stance is neutral overall, though the selection of critical reactions slightly tilts toward skepticism.

• reports Trump's actions and statements without evaluative adjectives
• uses direct quotes and neutral attribution for US positions
• includes critical reactions from other countries and officials
• occasionally highlights US threats and aggressive moves

Coverage is largely factual reporting of US actions and statements, but the selection includes many headlines about US threats and aggressive moves (tariffs, military deployments, territorial demands), which could imply a critical slant. However, the outlet does not use overtly hostile language toward the US itself, and also reports US diplomatic initiatives (e.g., inviting India to Gaza peace board). The entity is 'US' as a country, not the Trump administration specifically, so the stance is neutral overall.

• Quotes Maduro's own words without evaluative commentary
• Reports US actions and Venezuelan reactions factually
• Includes both pro- and anti-Maduro voices
• Uses dramatic but not inherently hostile language

Coverage is primarily factual and event-driven, with no consistent editorial stance toward Venezuela as a country. Headlines mix Maduro's quotes, US operations, and opposition figures without clear positive or negative framing of the entity itself. The entity is 'VE' (country), not a specific leader, so stance is neutral overall.