RT · April 2026

• amplifies Russian officials' statements as authoritative
• frames Russia as victim of external aggression
• celebrates Russian achievements (space, nuclear, Orthodox culture)
• uses positive or neutral framing for Russian actions, negative for adversaries

RT is a state-funded outlet; the entity (Russia) is the home country, so coverage is uniformly promotional. Headlines that quote Russian officials (Lavrov, Medvedev) treat them as credible voices, and Russian projects (space, nuclear) are highlighted positively.

• Quoting Trump's threats and claims with distancing verbs
• Highlighting contradictions and failures in Trump's policies
• Featuring critics and experts who undermine Trump's narrative
• Emphasizing negative consequences of Trump's actions

RT often quotes Trump directly, which could imply authority, but the surrounding framing (e.g., 'conflicting narratives', expert criticism, and focus on negative outcomes) consistently undercuts his credibility. Headline 1 is neutral, but the bundle overall leans skeptical.

• highlights US internal dysfunction and scandals
• frames US actions as aggressive or hypocritical
• amplifies foreign and domestic critics of US policy
• uses distancing or negative framing for US officials

The outlet frequently quotes US officials directly, but the selection and framing consistently emphasize conflict, hypocrisy, and negative consequences, indicating a skeptical stance toward the US as an entity.