Reforma · August 2026

• Uses neutral reporting verbs for government actions
• Occasional critical framing of government figures (e.g., 'Rocha Moya' challenges)
• Includes both positive and negative coverage of the entity
• Frequent use of direct quotes without strong evaluative language

Coverage is mixed: some headlines highlight government achievements (e.g., infrastructure, optimism) while others report controversies (e.g., homicide targets, court orders). The outlet does not consistently frame the entity positively or negatively; stance is neutral overall.

• Uses neutral verbs like 'acusa', 'anuncia', 'asegura', 'dice' without evaluative framing
• Direct quotes presented without distancing or approval markers
• Mix of policy actions, threats, and political outcomes reported factually
• Occasional critical context (poll drop, potential impeachment) but not editorialized

Coverage is largely neutral and event-driven. Some headlines report Trump's aggressive statements (threats to Iran, Canada) without endorsing or condemning them, which could be read as amplifying his voice, but the outlet does not use celebratory or hostile language. The inclusion of negative items (popularity drop, possible impeachment) balances any implicit favorability. Stance toward Trump is therefore neutral overall.

• Uses Trump's name and direct quotes without consistent evaluative adjectives
• Reports both actions and controversies without clear editorial slant
• Occasionally includes critical context (e.g., 'demanda', 'amaga') but not uniformly
• Mix of policy, legal, and political stories with no single narrative

The entity is the US, but coverage focuses heavily on Trump as its representative. Some headlines (e.g., 'Amaga Trump a Omán', 'México perjudica a EU') could imply negative framing of Trump's actions, but the outlet does not consistently editorialize; many are straightforward reports. The quoted content is often aggressive, but the outlet's own stance toward the US/Trump appears neutral overall.

• Uses neutral verbs like 'propone', 'anuncia', 'habla', 'reúne' without evaluative adjectives
• Occasionally frames Sheinbaum as subject of external pressure (protests, court orders, opposition demands)
• Quotes her directly without distancing markers, but also reports criticism against her
• Mix of policy announcements, diplomatic actions, and domestic controversies

Coverage is largely factual and balanced. Some headlines (e.g., 'Protestan ante Sheinbaum', 'Urge Oposición a Sheinbaum') show she is the target of criticism, but the outlet does not adopt that criticism as its own voice. Headline 14 quotes her defensively ('Una visa no define a una persona'), which could be seen as giving her space to respond, but overall no consistent positive or negative slant toward her emerges.