New York Times · Februar 2026

• outlet's own evaluative vocabulary frames Trump negatively (e.g., 'false or unproven claims', 'moral vacuum', 'neoroyalism')
• headlines highlight Trump's failures, controversies, and negative consequences of his actions
• opinion pieces explicitly condemn Trump's policies and character
• fact-checking and critical framing of Trump's statements and claims

The bundle includes both news and opinion pieces; the opinion section is overtly hostile, while news headlines also use critical framing (e.g., 'false or unproven claims', 'erases the government’s power'). The outlet consistently treats Trump as a problematic figure, not as a credible authority.

• neutral reporting of government actions and events
• critical opinion pieces on administration policies
• factual coverage of political and legal developments

The bundle includes both neutral news reporting (e.g., election results, summit coverage) and sharply critical opinion pieces (e.g., 'Trump’s Shields Are Down', 'Closer to Autocracy'), but the entity is 'US' as a country, not the administration. Stance toward the US as a nation is neutral overall, though some headlines imply institutional critique.

• associates Epstein with scandal, resignation, and criminal investigation
• uses 'toxicity' and 'controversy' as descriptors of his legacy
• frames Epstein as a corrupting influence on elites and institutions
• highlights victim perspective and missing records as systemic failures

The outlet's own vocabulary ('toxicity', 'controversy', 'insult for victims') and selection of stories about resignations and investigations consistently frame Epstein negatively. Headline 24 explicitly sides with victims against Epstein's enablers. No headlines present Epstein neutrally or positively.