New York Times · Juni 2026

• Frames Trump's actions as self-serving or agenda-driven (e.g., 'Trump's agenda', 'stand to profit')
• Uses distancing or negative verbs like 'baseless', 'rebuking', 'fights'
• Highlights conflicts, legal challenges, and internal opposition
• Occasionally neutral reporting of actions (nominations, pardons)

Several headlines are neutral or factual (e.g., 21, 24), and some report on Trump's own statements without overt evaluation. The negative stance is most evident in headlines that expose potential conflicts of interest, constitutional overreach, or baseless claims, but the outlet does not consistently use hostile language across all items.

• Frequent use of 'Trump' as subject with negative or contentious actions
• Headlines highlight legal defeats, investigations, and rebukes
• Neutral framing of non-Trump U.S. entities (courts, states, agencies)
• Occasional neutral reporting on policy or events

The entity is the U.S. as a country, but most headlines focus on the Trump administration, which is treated critically (legal losses, rebukes, investigations). Non-Trump U.S. institutions (courts, states) are reported neutrally or positively. The stance is toward the U.S. government under Trump, not the nation as a whole.