New York Times · Juli 2026

• Frames Trump's actions as failures or problematic (e.g., 'didn't work', 'hurting', 'gutting')
• Uses neutral verbs but highlights negative consequences or controversies
• Occasionally notes positive or neutral actions (e.g., dropping subpoena) but often with caveats
• Frequent focus on political maneuvering and self-interest

The outlet does not use overtly hostile language, but consistently selects stories that emphasize negative outcomes, controversies, or self-dealing. Some headlines are purely factual (e.g., #23) and show balance, but the overall framing leans skeptical/critical of Trump.

• Frequent focus on Trump administration actions with critical framing
• Use of 'Trump' as shorthand for U.S. government, often in negative contexts
• Headlines highlight controversies, legal battles, and policy impacts
• Occasional neutral reporting on non-Trump U.S. matters

The entity is 'US' but most headlines center on the Trump administration, which the outlet treats skeptically. Some headlines (e.g., 3, 6, 10) are neutral or about non-government entities, diluting the negative stance. The outlet's own institutional conflicts (subpoenas) may color coverage.