El Mundo · March 2026

• portrays Trump as erratic and self-interested
• highlights US foreign policy failures and contradictions
• uses distancing verbs and framing for US actions
• foregrounds negative consequences of US policies

The entity is 'US' but coverage focuses overwhelmingly on Trump's actions and statements, which are treated critically; some headlines are neutral or unrelated to US stance. The outlet's own voice is skeptical of US leadership, not celebratory.

• Quotes allies praising Sánchez but also quotes critics attacking him
• Uses neutral reporting verbs and attribution for both sides
• Highlights Sánchez's isolation and confrontations with Trump, Israel, and EU leaders
• Includes headlines that frame Sánchez as politically calculating

The outlet reports both positive and negative statements about Sánchez from third parties without adopting a clear editorial stance. Headlines 1 and 3 show external praise, while 5, 7, 16, 17, 20, 21, and 22 highlight criticism and isolation. The outlet's own voice is largely neutral, though selection of critical headlines slightly outweighs positive ones. No consistent evaluative language toward Sánchez is used by the outlet itself.

• Quotes Trump's aggressive or erratic statements with distancing verbs
• Frames Trump as a source of conflict and instability
• Highlights opposition to Trump from European and Iranian actors
• Includes personal or trivializing coverage (e.g., rash, Epstein documents)

Headline 13 is positive ('Nobel de la Paz merece Trump'), but it is an outlier; the overwhelming majority of headlines are critical or skeptical, often quoting Trump's own words to show him as belligerent or unreliable.

• Relies on official statements from both sides without evaluative framing
• Quotes Iranian officials and experts directly, giving them a platform
• Uses neutral verbs like 'asegura', 'confirma', 'afirma' for both Israeli and Iranian claims
• Includes expert analysis that contextualizes Iranian actions without overt judgment

The outlet quotes Iranian officials and experts (e.g., ex-ambassador, current ambassador) without distancing language, which could imply a neutral or slightly favorable treatment, but the overall coverage is balanced with Israeli and US perspectives. The entity is a country, not a person, so stance is assessed on how the outlet frames Iran as an actor; no consistent hostility or celebration is evident.

• critical framing of government decisions
• neutral reporting of political events
• occasional positive or neutral mentions of Spain-related figures

The entity is Spain as a country, not a single actor; coverage includes both critical articles about government policy (e.g., military actions, diplomatic isolation) and neutral or positive stories about Spanish individuals (e.g., athletes, royals). The stance is neutral overall because the outlet does not consistently treat Spain itself as a target of hostility or celebration.

• Macron quoted directly as authoritative voice on foreign policy
• Macron's initiatives presented as proactive and significant
• Macron shown as a key European leader supporting Spain
• Some critical coverage of Macron's domestic political moves

Headlines 13 and 14 introduce some criticism of Macron's domestic actions and a conspiracy theory, but the overall bundle treats Macron as a credible, leading figure in international affairs, with his statements amplified without distancing verbs.